留言人: 九萬里
主題: re:中共利用霍英東指鹿為馬搞統戰！
留言日期: 11/9/2006 3:41:00 AM
在舊殖民時代，政府不大控制言論，對付學生，也只是不讓你學，不讓你知，這稱之為奴化教育。但傳媒仍敢說。今天可不一樣，政府帶頭混淆是非，講大話。最可憐是眾傳媒一一收口，不敢申明是非黑白，這對年青人影響才大。他們自以為是國家未來的主人，卻原來滿腦子只是奴才的思想。
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 培聖人1000
主題: 中共利用霍英東指鹿為馬搞統戰！
留言日期: 11/9/2006 2:22:00 AM
香港人如果那麼贊同中共政權，鄧小平何須搞“一國兩制”和“五十年不變”這種荒謬的“解決方法”呢？鄧小平就是知道，香港人有自由中國人的正常價值觀，才說希望“我們要制造四十個香港”，意思是要中共的一制向香港和平演變，最終全國只有一制，就是自由個人主義社會的一制。既然承認香港人有香港人的一套價值觀，就應該知道，今天的中共，借題發揮，把這個完全因為利益而靠走私漏稅，叛亂中國的壞人霍英東大加表揚，這不就是公然挑戰自由社會裏的人類，信奉愛國愛社會愛自由法治，誠實守法，反對專制政權，反對黑社會秘密政府操作等價值嗎？
但，中共就是要公然指鹿為馬，要在香港進行“愛國教育”，要全香港年輕人看在眼裏，要他們忘記，這香港的一制，才是人類社會正常生存和發展的一套，反而要香港年輕人接收鄧小平想放棄卻欲罷不能的一套。
中共的一套，若果是正確的人類生存之道，為什麼共產黨專政以來，人民從未過過幾天好日子呢？就算今天的所謂“經濟發展”，也不過是在極度腐敗的垃圾堆裏的蓬勃，根本不是健康的生活方式啊！
所以，中共這樣在香港利用奸商霍英東的死做政治污染，企圖蒙騙香港人民，根本就是對香港人的最大羞辱！大家頭腦要清醒些啊！
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 九萬里
主題: 霍老靈堂花圈與中央領導權力行情之更緊密關係
留言日期: 11/8/2006 2:19:00 PM
《霍老靈堂花圈與中央領導權力行情之更緊密關係》
這又是特區國情教育與通識敎育必修的章節。特區的中、小學老師可能還未有這種 sense，但不可不知，每個人都應該知，這是特區教育的重要構成部分。要告訴你，這種見微知著式的中國國情通報機制，屬必修，不可不學。
請先打開霍老靈堂平面圖看看：
http://www.flickr.com/photos/puishingsince1963/292083313/
靈堂左邊是中共中央、全國人大、國務院及政協等內地部門送的花圈，這些花圈全不重要。中國是個黨大於國，中央領導大於黨的國家，國家機構在此大可忽略。向右邊看，依次擺放國家主席胡錦濤、前國家主席江澤民、全國人大委員長吳邦國、國務院總理溫家寶的花圈。這才是玄機所在，看到了嗎？
還看不到？OK！那我問你：為何江澤民在前而溫家寶在後？一個已全身而退的普通中國公民為何會在現任總理之前？其中隱含了非常玄妙的中國國情。或許你說，這是私人喪禮，排名依死者生前親朋戚友的親疏排列，有甚稀奇。這顯然不對，你知道治喪委員會主任是誰？是專程來港的全國政協副主席王忠禹。這明顯是一場國葬儀式，以國家領導人規格舉行，一點也不能亂，這是中共中央的傳統。
從來看中共中央的權力行情，誰上誰落，誰得權，誰失勢，都是從這小小一丁點的排位得知。從人大會議眾中央領導的出場序，到中央電視台晚間新聞報導中央領導人名單時的先後；誰個固有的名字突然消失了，誰個新人在出場隊列中突然出現，都可從中探知中央領導層的現況－－是鬥爭得火熱，還是穩定地團結在一起。這些名單，就如量度人體體溫的探熱針，還是肛探的那一支，深入不毛，不偏不倚的插入中央人事團結的寒熱中心點。
明白玄機所在，就懂得看風頭火勢了。站在牆頭，知道風吹那面，要倒向那方，那做起事來，就無往而不利。
再看看，那扶靈行列中，站在最前的是誰，噢！是董伯伯呀！那曾亞財呢？對不起，原來他叨陪在末座。看行情，特區快有好日子過了！
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: Big Nose 1977
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 3:39:00 PM
It is difficult if meaningful to analyze what would have happened if things were different.
Never assume as it would make an ass out of you and me...
If you were to assume this and that might or might not have happened, equally; I can also assume other possibilities that might or might not have happened...that would have changed the history ...
Personally, it desn't really matter to me either way. He might have done good or bad but as far as I am concern, he has done nothing for me direclty. I might or might not have indirectly benefited from things he did. Either way, it doesn't bother me at all.
I do, however, find it strange that some people would make all sorts of remarks about Mr. Fok as if he knew him and all the things Mr. Fok had done...especially those passing bad remarks about Mr. Fok; I really doubt if they really know much about him, the background, the rationale, the politics etc etc to pass any valid comment...
Then again, this world is filled with people who know very little but present themselves as experts ...
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: steve
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 2:41:00 PM
話轉正題,以本人之意見來言,對於霍英來之徙有責多於讚.原因如下: 如果不是他暗中偷運原油到大陸幫助北朝鮮抗美國及南韓,現在就不會產生北韓的這樣極權國家.如果韓國是不分南北之分,它會比日本更強大.日夲仔就不會獨佔日本海的優勢把我国多個島嶼佔為已有.韓国對中國是真心的平等對待,不像日本的假意煋煋.大陸的抗美援朝使我國同胞傷亡慘重,資源盡沽.更在與蘇联老大哥反臉後要還出金錢與食糧給北極態,以到中國人民連褲子都沒有,路有凍死骨之苦處.你們說霍老之好處是何在呢?..他幫助香港的足球事業及後半生都有做應做之事.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: Big Nose 1977
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 1:42:00 PM
Have you ever thought about 即炒 may be even better for you?
I can tell you are not happy working there anyway; why holding on to something that is making you miserable and your life like a living hell?
I am sure, for whatever reasons, you would want to hold onto teh job; and let someone else help to release you from hell ... good luck to you!
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:09:00 PM
再為這冇謂野,寫下去,真冇謂,一陣太子返來,知道我寫d廢話,即炒都似.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: Big Nose 1977
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:07:00 PM
老坑,
I tried looking up the dictionary and couldn't find the meanng of "save,啃汽" ...
Is "save" English or Chinese? Does 倉頡 not support the Chinese equivalnet of "save"?
Why did you type English and not Chinese?
Oh dear, 老坑 doesn't want to play any more ... don't be so "little air" la ...
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 11:46:00 AM
有野你就寫,唔好放咁多口水,你寫你的錯句啦,以後唔會話你,save,啃汽.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: Big Nose 1977
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 11:16:00 AM
老坑,
Never try to teach a duck how to xxxx ...
I bet you might not have heard of this expression in your life ... try looking it up in the Oxford Dict ... haha ...
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: Big Nose1 977
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 11:13:00 AM
老坑
有錯就要改啦,你都唔知算咩?唔係話牛津大晒,你可以用朗文,一樣係有果5個句型,法就係法,邊本字典都係一樣,如果你真係有錯,你所講的是用口話,講話,你錯都冇人理你,不過,文件書信就不容有錯,可能你公司要求唔高姐,唔代表其他公司都一樣.
Big Nose: why are you still acting like a fool!? what are you trying to prove here?
Just look at your last post, if you hold such high standards; how come your Chinese is so appalling? Do you write like that at work?
文件書信就不容有錯 - it depends what kind of 文件書信, right? We are not talking about legal agreements here, are we?
可能你公司要求唔高姐,唔代表其他公司都一樣 - exactly, horses for courses, why do you insist people write the way you want them to write? After all, who are you? All I know is that you are just a not-so-successful worker working (or used to work) for Mr. Fok's group. A pathetic lonely soul who lives in a cage (fuguratively speaking)...
Like I said, go and read your dictionary and stop beating the drums about 5個句型 ... you are boring and so naive ... why don't you go to England and see how successful your 5個句型 is in the land of the English speaking nation?
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 11:04:00 AM
You might think my English is not up to the Oxford standard, ???????
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 10:49:00 AM
有錯就要改啦,你都唔知算咩?唔係話牛津大晒,你可以用朗文,一樣係有果5個句型,法就係法,邊本字典都係一樣,如果你真係有錯,你所講的是用口話,講話,你錯都冇人理你,不過,文件書信就不容有錯,可能你公司要求唔高姐,唔代表其他公司都一樣.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: Big Nose 1977
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 10:37:00 AM
老坑
Why do you insist on people typing in Chinese?
Why do you insist on people writing Oxford style English?
Hey, if you want to learn "better" English; fine, do it some place else. I do not believe this forum is designed for English improvement. At least, do not come bitching about this and that. We are living in 2006 and teh world has changed from stone ages. Communication takes different form and different style. You can remain in a cage and refuse to change; it is up to you. To me, the key of communication is understanding. Everyone makes typo errors and so long it is understood; do we need to be perfect? If you do not understand, is it neccesary someone else's problem?
老坑, I have been working for a long time and I always have a non-Chinese boss (who speaks and writes in English only). You might think my English is not up to the Oxford standard, but you are naive to suggest that one would get to keep a job by Oxford style English. Come to think of it, I am convinced that you are very naive and are none too successful with your career. I have been in my current job for 10 years and my boss is an American - come what may, my English can not be as bad as you think.
Besides, there are different forms and style in writing. Oxford style writing is rather academic luxury as in the real world, people hardly write in such a style.
Continue to read the dictionary if you it makes you happy; and when you are done with Oxford style English, try reading a book or two on Business Writing skill. Also, do you speak English? I am inclined to believe that you cannot speak the language. This makes you nothing more than like a moron; holding a Oxford book; telling people off about how bad their English is. Do you know how pathetic you are?
Just don't come bitching and critizing others about their English or whatever else. There is no reason for you, or anyone to come around and spoiling fun for others, right? Think about it.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 10:12:00 AM
當你熟打倉頡,你會發覺唔會打得慢過英文打字,總之學多d野都冇所謂,我所講的都冇意打擊任何師兄師弟,我只想有錯改之,精益求精.特別係英文寫作,當你在公司寫份報告書給上司或老闆,你就冇可能有任何錯誤的.否則會炒的.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: steve(70)
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 9:52:00 AM
I did not say your grammar is wrong. What I said was you used the wrong examples to illustrate your point. If you paid more attention to my posting you would understand more.Sometimes if I am in a hurry like before going to work in the morning I just typed in English rather that in Chinese because I hate to say it:writing in English is more efficient than Chinese.
Mr. Li if you want to start a friendly argument, you should read the previous posts before putting your foot in your mouth. It was someone else who started the sidetracking on the main subject, not me. Have a nice day.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 9:38:00 AM
咩叫文法,法是有規範,唔係亂寫,they stop to eat 同they stop eating 就係完全2句不同的意思和文法,第一句是第一句型,s+vi,第2句是第2句型 s+vt+o, 意思想表達出來是完全不同意思.唔識就係要學....
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 8:54:00 AM
1.就係因為英文唔好,就唔好出洋相,就用中文,2.我們是中國人點解唔用中文,3.你地唔識輸入法咪去學,唔好寫d英交又唔知你地寫d咩出黎,比外人睇到,見到培聖仔d英文錯漏百出,真係笑死人,4.我唔係話我英文好,我英文是非常差,但我一路學緊,不過,如果牛津高階都話你錯,你就一定錯,每一日都學習牛津高階半小時,也得益不少,我寫句型出黎,就係想你地知道,是由這5句句型變化出來.但唔該你地睇下之前的文章,你就知道邊個要補習......
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: Edward Li
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 7:35:00 AM
It is very strange phenomenon here talking about Old Folk's dead had shifted to the topic of English grammer. If you really believe your English is better than others, you could write a passage in English telling us about your view on Mr. OLd Folk.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: steve(70)
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 3:45:00 AM
Strictly speaking the phrase "They buy a pen to me " is incorrect unless your friends keep buying pens to you daily but who would want to do that? The grammar may be correct but the logic is not. It should be " They bought a pen to me." or "They will buy a pen to me." or "They are going to buy a pen to me."But the following is correct: They cook a meal for me daily.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 培聖人1000
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 3:00:00 AM
連“中共”這樣也叫強國，甚么糊涂蟲的理論？強國還須天天大叫要“構建和諧社會”，大叫要“和平崛起”嗎？當年若中共政權不穩，結果被迫解散，就沒有後來的三十年“關門打仔”的“社會主義改造”，就不會餓死鬥死那麼多人民，不用浪費幾十年發展時間，今天的中國，一定早就已經是世界主角很久了！
霍老是奸商一名，其他甚么都不是！
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:44:00 AM
訓覺先,明天請早,記得補習啦.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:41:00 AM
我只是想話句型.例句之前已修正了
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:40:00 AM
你唔該睇番之前我的留言,這已改正了.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: Little Cat
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:37:00 AM
Lo Hang, Please read carefully before you copy something and paste. See the following quote:
1.subject + vt + object
ex:I love you.
2.subject + vi
ex:They stoped .....Should be 'stopped'
3.subject + vi + prep
ex:He listen to the radio....Should be 'listens'
4a.subject + vi + 人 + 物
ex:They buy me a pen
4b subject + vi + 物 + to 人
ex: They buy a pen to me
5.subject + (verb to be) + complement
ex: He is a boy.
所以做到老,學到老,唔識就要補習...this is right!!
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:36:00 AM
明天請教下你的老師們
let's go and find an English speaking (mother tongue) person, and let him/her be the judge of whether your or my English is better. The loser will buy dinner.
這句話同我剛才引述牛津字典,有咩錯先講啦.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: Big Nose 1977
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:36:00 AM
Sure, little cat, I am just getting a bit bored with this 老坑 anyway...
Let's get some sleep and rest ... catch you later..
By the way, 老坑, Little and I are two different bodies, though our mind may be as one ... try figuring this out ...
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: Big Nose 1977
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:33:00 AM
老坑,
for a brief moment, I thought you were funny.
Seriously, is that all you can do, just throw me a few quotes from a book? Oh dear, am I taking exams here?
Here is my challenge to you:
let's go and find an English speaking (mother tongue) person, and let him/her be the judge of whether your or my English is better. The loser will buy dinner.
Deal or no deal? put up or shut up?
If you need more time to read a few more books, I can wait (for up to a month).
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:33:00 AM
Big Nose,唔使激脹法,對我已冇用了,我早已看破紅塵
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:31:00 AM
剛才一段,唔係我勁,唔關我事,係在牛津字典高階裡搵出黎.我唔勁,邊有你咁勁呀.拍馬都未有來啦.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: little cat
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:29:00 AM
To: Big Nose
Let 'Lo Hang' go...he could not say anything more, but just pick up some grammer mistake from what you wrote even he could not point out what your English is wrong.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:27:00 AM
你先學左咩叫5個句型先啦.
據牛津字典第四版引述,正確的英文文法是有基本的5個句型,絕大部份句法都是由這引申出來的.
1.subject + vt + object
ex:I love you.
2.subject + vi
ex:They stoped
3.subject + vi + prep
ex:He listen to the radio.
4a.subject + vi + 人 + 物
ex:They buy me a pen
4b subject + vi + 物 + to 人
ex: They buy a pen to me
5.subject + (verb to be) + complement
ex: He is a boy.
所以做到老,學到老,唔識就要補習
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: Big Nose 1977
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:27:00 AM
I am sure your best is probably 扮勁 and not 勁 ... don't worry, no one can tell you are 扮勁 as you are nowhere near 勁, no matter how hard you try ... don't over-estimate yourself ...
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: Big Nose 1977
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:25:00 AM
I was just impressed that you can read my words, you even picked up the mistakes ... wow, at least I can tell you are not visually different from normal ...
I would not tell someone he is wrong without back up; even a sick puppy can talk empty ...
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:21:00 AM
唔感當,你問下d英文老師啦,廢事比人話扮勁.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: Big Nose 1977
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:19:00 AM
I am sure your English is better, care to show me where I went wrong? if you can...please?
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:17:00 AM
Big Nose: as if you know me at all!! Besides, what wrong with 自己要求太低? I am hurting no one, and if I am happy, what is it to you or anyone
你又寫錯文法了.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: Big Nose 1977
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:16:00 AM
老坑
Big Nose 1977,你自己要求太 低了.
Big Nose: as if you know me at all!! Besides, what wrong with 自己要求太低? I am hurting no one, and if I am happy, what is it to you or anyone?
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: little cat
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:15:00 AM
"唔好扮啦,你咪有係Big Nose 1977"
1. I am not Big Nose definitely
2. 有...wrong word...but I do not mind, because I understand what you mean.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: Big Nose 1977
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:14:00 AM
批評你又點Big Nose 1977
Big Nose: if your 批評 makes any sense, I would take my hat off for you; since your 批評 doesn't really make any sense, I am afraid I would only take my pants off ...
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:13:00 AM
Big Nose 1977,你自己要求太 低了.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:09:00 AM
批評你又點Big Nose 1977
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: Little Cat
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:08:00 AM
To: Lo Hang
Language is just a tool for communication. Please do not critise other's English level. This is not important at all. if you do not understand what we are saying, you could question us.
Anyway, Big Nose's English is just fluently great to me!
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:07:00 AM
唔好扮啦,你咪有係Big Nose 1977
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: little cat
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/2/2006 12:01:00 AM
To: Lo Hang
Again, please understand that this forum is open for all Puishing guys. Please respest other's opinions.
If you really feel that Fok's grandson is that bad, just quit. Please tell us why you are still working for him. Don't tell us it is because of earning for your living!
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/1/2006 11:40:00 PM
都唔知你寫咩春?blieve咩有這個英文字咩?like it or not?這都係英文?唔好再寫啦,同你d理論一樣教壞人.
Frankly, I sincerely hope that you would remain single and not have any children yourself, as I blieve you are not really fit as parent.
Like it or not, I am from 培聖; and sometimes, you cannot blame one's behavior, good or bad, on 培聖 ... I won't, if you know what I mean.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/1/2006 11:36:00 PM
即係廢話,學下打中交先啦,講咁多.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: Big Nose 1977
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/1/2006 11:32:00 PM
老坑
咁如果你有女,希望你個女可以比佢地滾下,因為你話只有強姦先係illegal,比佢地滾就冇所謂,你d咩理論,你都short short地,枉你係培聖d校?你唔好教壞人啦.
Big Nose: there is a difference between hope, wish, dream, hiding your head in the sand and bitching hoping the world will become a perfect somehow.
Firstly, I do not have a daughter. But even if I have a daughter, and if I do not want her to be 滾上床, I would do my best to "educate" her. I won't lock her up and keep her from the real world as she would need to face the real world somehow. I definitely won't go around bitching other young men going around 滾女仔上床 ...
Frankly, I sincerely hope that you would remain single and not have any children yourself, as I blieve you are not really fit as parent.
Like it or not, I am from 培聖; and sometimes, you cannot blame one's behavior, good or bad, on 培聖 ... I won't, if you know what I mean.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/1/2006 9:35:00 PM
學下英文先啦
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/1/2006 9:34:00 PM
咁如果你有女,希望你個女可以比佢地滾下,因為你話只有強姦先係illegal,比佢地滾就冇所謂,你d咩理論,你都short short地,枉你係培聖d校?你唔好教壞人啦.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/1/2006 9:29:00 PM
都唔知你講咩,文法又錯,都廢事答你.short short地.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: Big Nose 1977
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/1/2006 9:27:00 PM
培聖人1000 / 老坑
培聖人講的是真的,當年全世界都對中共拖行禁運,等於今日你運野去北韓,就等於走私,是不容許的.
Big Nose: true, if only "全世界" does agree on something unanimously (which is probably quite impossible).
There is always two sides to a coin. Imagine, just imagine Mr Fok did not do what everyone said he did (which to you is WRONG), what would China have become today?
Likely that China would not be as strong as today (though I cannot prove it, let's assume this is the case), would you still prefer Mr. Fok to have stayed in line (and have a weak China today) or would you rather he stepped across the line (and have a much stronger China today)?
I know what my choice is, I don't know about yours.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: Big Nose 1977
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/1/2006 9:18:00 PM
老坑
師兄,我就重未結婚,不過佢d孫,成日滾d女仔上床,我就唔覺得佢地可以做d細路仔的榜樣,讀書就是求學,咁應唔應該攪男女性關係先?因佢有錢,讀書時已駕駛寶馬,d學生妹當然好易比佢溝啦,總之,我對老霍絕對尊重,白手興家,雖然有四個老婆,佢d後人我就不感恭維了.
Big Nose: So this is how you judge a person, right?
成日滾d女仔上床 - As I don't really know these boys, from what I read in the news, these boys are nothing more than an average young man.
As for 滾d女仔上床; well, I am sure these boys are doing no more than what their forefather did.
It might not meet your moral standards but hey, who are you to them anyway.
Also, I believe it must not be easy coming from such a rich and famous family, things are totally different in the eyes of common people (I assume you are one of them) - if you were from the circle of rich and famous; would you see, do and think the same as you do now? I seriously doubt it.
Look at it from a different angle, having a grandfather who had 3 wives, a father who had his marriage under public eyes continually and ended up with a broken marriage; these boys are victims and since none of them ended up dead with drug OD; they are doing well. is that all you can do, just kicking ass?
Just remember, rape is wrong and illegal, 滾女仔上床 is not.
做d細路仔的榜樣 - oh dear, who said they are or should 做d細路仔的榜樣?
讀書就是求學,咁應唔應該攪男女性關係先 - get real, you can dream on and on; but when you do get to look outside the cage, you will find tht we are living in 2006. Government stats have shown that a high percentage of STUDENTS are having sex. How do we define who should or should not have sex? Legally, one can have sex at 16 or older (physically, one can have sex even earlier), therefore, if the boys want to have sex and there are girls (over 16) who are willing to do it with them, what is your problem?
因佢有錢,讀書時已駕駛寶馬,d學生妹當然好易比佢溝啦 - again, you seem to be living on a different planet. there are plenty of 學生妹 who would 比boys who are not rich 溝...!
我對老霍絕對尊重,白手興家,雖然有四個老婆,佢d後人我就不感恭維了- I just don't understand you, how can you 尊重 someone who had 四個老婆, and kicking ass to the boys who are courting girls (at such age, 溝女 is perfectly normal)? Surely the old man also 溝女 and "滾"女仔上床 before turning the girls into 老婆, right!?
老坑, you are a strange cat a far as I am concern, with you respect or not, those boys will continue to do what they enjoy to do, which is 100 time more enjoyable than you and I bitching here...that's for sure..
Chill a little 老坑!
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/1/2006 8:28:00 PM
師兄,我就重未結婚,不過佢d孫,成日滾d女仔上床,我就唔覺得佢地可以做d細路仔的榜樣,讀書就是求學,咁應唔應該攪男女性關係先?因佢有錢,讀書時已駕駛寶馬,d學生妹當然好易比佢溝啦,總之,我對老霍絕對尊重,白手興家,雖然有四個老婆,佢d後人我就不感恭維了.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/1/2006 8:21:00 PM
培聖人講的是真的,當年全世界都對中共拖行禁運,等於今日你運野去北韓,就等於走私,是不容許的.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 霍老
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/1/2006 7:07:00 PM
發橫財立品，誰都做得到，有什麼了不起！
can you? I doubt you can 發橫財; and I believe you can not 立品 even if you want to try.
Come on, respect the dead a little; will you?
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 培聖人1000
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/1/2006 6:32:00 PM
在電視看見唐英年對霍英東的評價，說霍是什麼偉大的愛國者，真不能相信！還有那梁振英，也有類似的評價！
可見香港今天的高官們是什麼水平了！原來一個人的價值，在於“愛國”，而且連共產黨國都可以愛！共產黨何曾愛國？愛國為什麼叫“共產黨”？為什麼不叫“愛國黨”？共產黨就是信馬教的黨，馬教是否定國家的教，也是否定民族的教，馬叫只講“階級鬥爭”，何來愛國！？
梁振英唐英年這些受外國教育的人，到底讀了什麼書，竟然是非不分，就胡亂放屁呢？真是嘆為觀止啊！
照唐英年梁振英這些無知機會主義分子的說法，人的價值，在“愛國”！人的價值，不在誠實實幹，奉公守法，以真才實料來競爭。“愛國”不需要分清是非黑白，只要有生意可做，就一定做，走私漏稅都可以，就叫“愛國”了！
霍老是不誠實的商人一個，如何愛國？若愛國，竟然早就選擇了“共產黨國”來愛，哪他算什麼白痴嘛？當年他走私軍火和戰爭物資給中共時，“中國”就是“中華民國”而已！全世界都只把“中供”看成割據大陸的臨時非法政權而已！哪霍老的走私“愛國”，不就是在叛國嗎？ 說他“愛國”，不就是今天因時制宜，新朝“追封”而已嗎？如果新朝表揚的，叫愛國，哪文天祥那種是什麼啦？
香港的高官，懂幾個英文字，就亂放屁，連霍老都當愛國，怪不得這九年來，香港搞成這樣局面了！
霍老是奸商一名，發財後有空就“立品”而已！什麼狗屁愛國？發橫財立品，誰都做得到，有什麼了不起！
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: Big Nose 1977
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/1/2006 6:27:00 PM
老坑
我在他們公司工作了多年,對他們都有小小認識,總之真的沒有三代富,工作態度,孫不及父,父不及爺,開會時都唔知佢想點,又唔明佢地講咩,至於孫仔d私生活就唔係正常人所謂,其他的更不需多言了.
Big Nose: now I see why you have an axe to grind; so you have brushed shoulders with the Foks and had dealings with them.
I do not know the Foks and I have had no dealings with them none whatsoever. Hence, my comment is very much based upon generalization.
Having said that, I can't help but feel that you should look outside the cage. Even if the Fok juniors are not as good as the Fok Seniors; so what? Why should the Fok juniors have everything and do everything right and are better than their seniors?
Why should they behave and act in a way you see fit? Besides coming from a rich family; the Fok juniors are very much like eevryone else; they have their fair share of problems too.
Who are you to judge them? And suggest they are up to no good?
I don't know if you have any children; but if you do, are you sure they are as good as what other think they are?
Live and let live, 老坑 ...
By the way, keep your hair on, if you still have any...
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: little cat
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/1/2006 6:24:00 PM
I was just telling my opinions and I do think that the purpose of this forum is to collect different ideas, feelings or opinions from different members.
Please do not get mad and be 'open'.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/1/2006 5:27:00 PM
我講事實,使鬼你認同.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: Little Cat
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/1/2006 5:10:00 PM
I agree with Big Nose. Everybody has different background, education and experience. Maybe, if you were his grandson, you might be even a lot worse!! I can tell!
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 11/1/2006 4:48:00 PM
我在他們公司工作了多年,對他們都有小小認識,總之真的沒有三代富,工作態度,孫不及父,父不及爺,開會時都唔知佢想點,又唔明佢地講咩,至於孫仔d私生活就唔係正常人所謂,其他的更不需多言了.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: Big Nose 1977
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 10/31/2006 10:55:00 PM
老坑
what is the problem? are you holding Mr. Fok senior responsible for all the wrong-doings his grandchildren do ?
besides, what is wrong with going out with a woman who is "國寶" / "明星", why would you use the word "玩", and what does "玩" mean anyway? Guys are allowed to go out with females, regardless of what their background is, right?
As for "生意又唔識做", how do you know? And besides, why should the grandchildren have to "識做生意"?
Coming from a rich family, the children have the opportunity to do what they really like; unlike the common people who have to work their butts off; if they are happy meeting girls, then what is it to you or anyone? Are you jealous?
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 10/31/2006 11:46:00 AM
不過佢d後人唔生性,d孫好難滾,鍾意玩國寶,但公司生意就唔理.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 梁定國
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 10/30/2006 4:53:00 PM
想唔到霍老受到一致好評,都已備極哀榮了。
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 老坑
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 10/30/2006
重有佢個孫,玩國寶,又玩明星,生意又唔識做,唔死就怪.
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 有心人
主題: re:霍老之死
留言日期: 10/29/2006 4:43:00 PM
年少時睇波，頭場由華人元老對西人元老，華元有兩名好波之人，一個可過幾個，老外出盡洋相，球迷則笑開懷，兩位好波之人，其一是「佛爺」黎兆榮，而另一位是「千萬腳」霍英東，看罷回來與老一輩的球迷談及兩位好波之人，他們說：「「佛爺」黎兆榮當然好波，而「千萬腳」霍英東就屬屎波，能扭過人是洋人禮讓」，我搔頭問何解會禮讓？答曰：「他有錢」，當時還是不明白有錢就可以「好波」的原因。從這時起識得香港有個霍英東。
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋
留言人: 梁定國
主題: 霍老之死
留言日期: 10/29/2006 3:38:00 PM
雖然早已生癌,但不肖子孫屢傳緋聞同大子離婚,於是激成病情惡化而死。
回上頁 | 主頁 | 搜尋